> > It seems like having the ability to define arguments for user-functions
> > would greatly increase the flexiblity of ctwm. Let me give an example:
>
> Don't reinvent the wheel: replace the ad-hoc "language" by a real one, or
> at least a pseudo real one. Tcl seems like an easy think to link in,
> even though Objective-Caml would be way cooler.
>
>
> Stefan
>
>
Hi, Stefan,
I have thought about adding tcl support long ago, but I didn't
found time (or energy) to do it. Do you plan to do it yourself ?
(or anyone else ?)
Claude.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sat Jun 22 2002 - 06:45:03 CEST