Re: ctwm future?

From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE
Date: Fri May 14 1999 - 11:40:41 CEST


Scott Perlman <sperlman@support.tivoli.com> writes:

> ctwm is functional, not gaudy. If you want gaud, you're not going to
> consider ctwm without a major re-write, and if you want lean and mean
> you aren't going to consider ctwm afterwards.

Ctwm has gone the bloat route already -- consider animated title bars
and animated buttons :-) But I agree, we shouldn't bloat it too
much. But nevertheless, I think adding some code to listen for KDE
window manager hints and/or Gnome window manager hints would be nifty.

kai

-- 
Abort this operation?   [Abort]  [Cancel]



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sat Jun 22 2002 - 06:45:05 CEST