Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE wrote:
> Bjorn Knutsson <bjorn@DoCS.UU.SE> writes:
>
> > Gary Kline wrote:
> >
> > > ctwm is a marvelous window manager.... but if it's going
> > > to survive and prosper, integration would be a major plus.
> >
> > See, if you do that, you suddenly start playing catch up with
> > other KDE/Gnome window managers. What I like about ctwm is that it
> > does the tricks I need from a window manager, but without a lot of
> > the fluff that's been creeping into most other WMs.
>
> I'm not even sure what's needed to be KDE or Gnome compliant. One
> obvious thing is that kwm keeps the room for the panel free of
> windows, even when they are maximized. I think adding such a feature
> to ctwm, for instance, wouldn't necessarily make it a pig.
If ctwm can be made KDE/Gnome compliant (whatever that means?) without making
it significantly bigger, slower or *requiring* that any new libraries be
linked, either dynamically or statically, then I'm all for it.
> What else is needed? Is there some documentation?
I'm sure there is. KDE/Gnome application keep popping up right, left and center
these days, and I doubt that all of them are by the core development team.
/Björn
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sat Jun 22 2002 - 06:45:05 CEST