Re: [ctwm] Is it ungarbled now?

From: Michael Widerkrantz <mc@hack.org>
Date: Mon Feb 12 2007 - 21:51:44 CET

Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <richard@levitte.org> writes:

> Please answer. I apparently have a very tolerant mail server, so I
> don't get the problem.

Yes. Seems OK.
Received on Mon Feb 12 21:51:50 2007

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Gary Kline: "Re: [ctwm] Is it ungarbled now?"
Previous message: Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker: "[ctwm] Is it ungarbled now?"
In reply to: Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker: "[ctwm] Is it ungarbled now?"
Next in thread: Gary Kline: "Re: [ctwm] Is it ungarbled now?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Feb 13 2007 - 06:45:10 CET